Blog Archives

What I Learned From “Birther” Lawsuits To Correctly Predict The Outcome of Texas v. PA

In August, 2008, they started pouring-in.  The “they” were “birther” cases arguing that Barack Obama was disqualified from being President of the United States on the allegation that he is not a “natural born” United States Citizen.   As late as November 2010, the SCOTUS was still dismissing such cases.  If anyone is interested in the majority of cases, there is a good list on Wikipedia.

The other day, Twitter was buzzing about the Attorney General for the State of Texas petitioning the Supreme Court of the United States to overturn election results in four states.   In response to one such tweet, I tweeted the following;

Trump culture has made things unpredictable.  After the death of Justice RBG, Trump’s brazenness to quickly appoint a Justice to the Supreme Court on the basis that he needed nine Justices to decide election controversies, made many voters nervous.  I hoped that judges and Justices would adhere to the basic requirements before they hear a case.

Regardless of their arguments, Plaintiffs have to meet a requirement in order for any court to hear their claims.  That requirement is “standing”. Read the rest of this entry

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: