Cyberharassment – Faces of Racism – Pt 4

Lessons learned, old lessons remembered……

(Alert.  Some might find the content in the comments of others presented in this article to be offensive.)

Five words I would hear on a regular basis day in and day out when training as an amateur boxer; “Protect yourself at all times.” You hear those words time and time again in the gym, even while hitting heavy bags or doing mitt work. It’s important even during sparring although those sessions are controlled and not as intense as an actual fight.

The idea is to instill that way of thinking into your head so you keep your hands up, keep your head moving and your feet moving, thus reducing the chance of getting caught with a shot you don’t see only to deposit you on the canvas.

It’s the last set of words you hear after having passed the ammunition to your opponent (Touching Gloves) and just before the opening bell sounds.

What do I mean in all of this? Lets look back when the internet started to surface and started to become the trend that it is today.

If you were a parent back then or even a single lady living alone, the internet was a place where you knew trouble lurked. You didn’t want your kids on the internet because you have prowlers trying to lure your kids to meet them. You have scam artists setting up websites in attempt to look legit but are intended to get your personal info and steal your identity or clean out your bank account. These are things we are all aware of and we all keep our guard up in regards to these types of realities. But I am going to take it even one step further. How many of you have surfed Youtube only to see some crazy conspiracy theories in the videos? I am pretty sure everybody here has stumbled across them on a couple of occasions.

The disturbing part is the creators of the videos; the creators of those theories, believe in them so much that if you even utter a word disagreeing they tend to claim your hired by the Government sent out to discredit truth seekers. Or am I the only one who happens to find Youtube users like that? Don’t take my word for it. Look up some of the Planet X theorist and try to debate reality with their warped sense of thinking and see what happens.

Anyhow, I have seen some crazy stuff surfing. There are videos where anti-Obama nutters claim that the Aurora shooting, Sandy Hook and even the Trayvon Martin shooting never took place. They claim that these were all paid actors and one huge effort to take away our 2nd amendment rights.

Yes I know you have seen that too, so where am I going with this? It is public knowledge that Mr. Stalker is epileptic, and suffers with panic attacks and depression.  It is safe to say there is plenty of mental illness running rampant on the internet. In dealing with all that, I have and having learned that many of you experienced the same with him as I did, I tend to ask myself why do we allow it? Another thing learned here, some people allow it because whether or not they admit to it, they enjoy the drama as well.

Recently, it’s come to my attention that a Ms. Filth has been issued 2 take down notices from an attorney in Michigan.  To be clear, there are at least three that we refer to as “Miss Filth” and do so because their comments and manners are filthy. This is the Miss Filth who interjected herself in Mr. Stalker’s case by submitting a declaration. Apparently, she is harassing a former girlfriend of Ted Wafer. (Ted Wafer was convicted for the murder of Renisha McBride.) Obviously, we have reason to believe why she is harassing this lady. The ex-girlfriend said some things that didn’t exactly make Ted look like a boy scout.

This is nothing new with Ms. Filth. She has harassed Ferguson witnesses; harassed the family of Trayvon Martin, Kendrick Johnson and Jordan Davis. Why are we surprised here? This of course leads me back full circle to Mr. Stalker, a person she advised to take me to court. Mr. Stalker opened a Facebook page to support Ted Wafer which he describes the purpose in the About section as;

“Seeking Justice for the shooter of Renisha McBride who was merely charged to appease race hustlers like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.”

So, we can see what Mr. Stalker and Miss Filth have in common.

By now you should all see the similarities, stalk, harass, lie to defame and threaten, and who do they do this to? Anyone who supports justice for people of color. This takes us right back to where I started; mental illness is a common denominator here. The internet has provided a safe haven for the mentally ill to use as a means to harass people they wouldn’t have the guts to harass up close in the real world. These individuals generally have no family ties and have limited their lives to social media. An obvious give away is that they spend the holidays on social media rather than being with family and loved ones celebrating.

The purpose here is to learn from our experiences and share those experiences with others so that they may better protect themselves from such attacks. But that also depends, as I said earlier, that some people do love the drama and do not mind mixing it up with them. This is how dangerous these people really are, put aside the fact that I have had to fork out thousands in legal expenses fighting off frivolous claims at the hands of Mr. Stalker.

Now, Miss Filth has gone well out of her way to dox a lady named Denise Souriall. Of course we are not surprised that she would dox anybody. She would dox a dog if she could. That’s been her game for ages. Denise Souriall was Ted Wafer’s girlfriend 20 years ago. Souriall spoke to media briefly regarding her relationship with Ted Wafer, of which she said he was a heavy drinker and had been abusive towards her.

Ms. Filth did not like what Souriall had to say about Mr. Wafer as a person, so she was compelled to dig up dirt and screw with this lady for no good reason. She did a little research and found that Ted Wafer filed for a restraining order against Souriall back in the 1990’s. What Ms. Filth conveniently left out was that the case was thrown out. Instead of pointing out that fact, Ms. Filth wrote a post on her blog stating that Ted Wafer was being stalked by this lady for 20 years. She went on to assume that Souriall stalking Mr. Wafer was the reason Renisha McBride was shot on Wafers porch on the assumption that Wafer believed it was Souriall.

(The posts on that blog have been removed.)

While she was busy pointing the finger at Ms. Souriall for Renisha McBride’s death on her blog, on Twitter, she inferred that Renisha’s brother thought that a witness in Ted Wafer’s trial was somehow responsible for Renisha’s death. Also, Miss Filth took a jab at the judges involved in the case.

Vicki's opposition to blame someone else for Renisha's death

Miss Filth did a similar defamation attack on Trent Sawyer. Trent Sawyer was active in making videos that addressed evidence in the George Zimmerman case. Miss Filth posted an arrest record for public indecency that she acknowledged was given to her by Mr. Stalker. An examination of that arrest record shows that the case was dismissed. In like manner, Miss Filth posts and gives her unqualified opinion of court documents, twisting them to say what she wants, and to pertain to whomever she wants.

Miss Filth continues her harassment of me along with Mr. Stalker. Please note in the screenshot below how she interprets a tweet sent to me. She cannot read my timeline because my Twitter account is protected, so she stalks the timelines of others to see what they are tweeting to me; anything that she can use to continue harassment.   Not anyone other than the harassers could read the following and interpret it to say that I think “all blacks are stupid.”  Mr. Stalker’s indirect harassment continues.

Harassment of Santiago

Continued harassmentIn conducting her defamation, Miss Filth likes to use documents file in court cases and giving her interpretation and omitting pertinent facts. She does this in the Kendrick Johnson case where the court released records to his parents and CNN. Miss Filth uses that court order, where she is not a party, to justify how she obtained Kendrick’s autopsy photos that even CNN has not publicly released.

When it comes to this blog, Miss Filth presents a court document and says that the case decision involves Xena. They have referred to Xena by the name of the party since around December 2012, threatening to use that court decision to defame Xena and expose her real name. They have also alleged other names as Xena’s real name. They are wrong, know they are wrong, but will not stop.

Allegations of name

Xena has shared with me that after receiving their threat to distribute the court decision to defame her unless she deleted this blog, that she Googled the name and other info in the court’s decision and found a very positive, impressive article written about that person in a Bar Association’s newsletter!  The article is about the same person who is a party to the court decision that Miss Filth, Mr. Stalker, and their minions send around accusing Xena of being a “fraud.”   Xena posted about the Bar Association’s article here on the blog and Miss Filth sent a comment saying that it must be Xena because Xena defended the person.

Of course the harassers would make that claim in hope that Xena would not mention or post the article.  So, I’m going to make it available. The article starts on page 11 of the newsletter, which is page 12 in pdf because of the cover page for the Newsletter.

I have recently spoke with Denise Souriall, whose attorney sent Miss Filth a letter demanding retraction.  Denise’s  story is just heart wrenching. The damage inflicted by Ms. Filth goes beyond just bad journalism in poor taste. There is a real element of fear because Souriall has to now live with wondering if some Wafter nutter will seek to take revenge on behalf of Wafer, or what if a supporter of McBride believed that Souriall was really the reason? Suddenly her life has been put in danger behind a story packed with lies written and distributed by Ms. Filth.

It goes even further than that. When Miss Filth published the story on her blog, there was a 30-year high school reunion that Souriall planned to attend. Being informed of the information posted by Ms. Filth, many of her former classmates were able to see this article. This placed Souriall in a very uncomfortable and defensive position during a time she should be celebrating and reminiscing with her friends from school.

In response to the letters to retract the defamatory article, Miss Filth tweeted to Mr. Stalker;

Harassment of Denise 1

When we look at these realities we are reminded of the very reason why we keep our kids off the internet as much as possible. We are suddenly reminded what kind of place the internet really is. Allot of good comes from the internet, but it does not outweigh the bad. There are real issues that have a direct impact on one’s life and also notice the people who are behind such attacks.

These people really have nothing to lose. Why else do you think they are doing this? They play this game because they know there is nothing they have in their life that is worth suing for, and some do this because they really believe it won’t get any further than the internet and that nobody will step up and challenge them in court.

I am proud of Denise for standing up for herself and taking steps to protect herself from Ms. Filth and I have offered my assistance in the matter, as Ms. Filth has done the exact same with me. The evidence has been forwarded over to Souriall and her attorney which will only help further prove their case.

IP address

Mr. Stalker under one of his many handles laughing about his use of proxy IP addresses.

There is much to consider when it comes to expressing your opinion and exercising your right to free speech. The best method to protect yourself is to block them as they come. I know it’s impossible to get away from some of them as they create dozens of different twitter accounts, etc.  As Xena has experienced also, even blocking them from submitting comments to the blog becomes a project as they use proxy IP addresses to circumvent the blocking of previous proxy IP addresses they have used.

It took Xena about 6 months, and working with hosting companies and law enforcement to block approximately 50 providers of proxy IP addresses. Since new companies that provide that service start all the time, Xena finally changed options that require a Word Press account to submit comments to this blog. It reduces the number of comments on blog articles, but has kept the harassers from submitting comments.   The harassers now mock that the comments on this blog are posted by the same 4 people.  Like any blog, that may or may not be true, depending on the subject of the article and time that people have to participate.  The harassers omit all common-sense and logic from their mocking, however.

The moment you engage with people who seek to make your life hell, you have given them the response they desired even if it’s a bad response. In other words, these people are simply looking for drama. They are looking to create as much chaos as they possibly can because they have the mindset that this is just the internet and that it will all be left on the internet.

How do we support each other and inform others of the methods of the harassment, while avoiding progressive, continued harassment?  We can’t.  As you can see, even with the court ordering that direct and indirect harassment stop, and the posting of my personal information and information purported to be my personal information be removed from the internet, it continues.

The people who commit these actions post more lies and get more filthy.  We counter their lies with the truth and do so to help others who might be suffering in silence to know that they are not alone.  For those who want to pursue legal options, we tell the truth to prepare them for battle.

While not engaging them, they should be reported to the source they use to conduct harassment. This is the internet and prowlers are always lurking looking for victims. Keep in mind you have people who live in their own reality. They fabricate stories to suit their agenda; from making up lies claiming Sandy Hook was a staged event, to making up lies about individuals. People will go as far as to take you to court behind lies and like Mr. Stalker, even after losing, file appeals and motions to commit paper harassment in the judicial system and make threats of suing for reporting what happened in court.

These are the same people who slander attorneys such as Ben Crump and Natalie Jackson, claiming they are lead conspirators who send others out to harass them. These prowlers will go to any length to harm those they have targeted, regardless of what harm it may actually cause a person and their family in doing so. They paint themselves as innocent people and patriots, such as Ms. Filth who spent several months pretending she was a child advocate, and another Miss Filth who portrays herself as feeding the homeless to offset her disgusting portrayals of victims such as Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown. She lives in Canada but is a strong supporter of conceal carry for self-defense in the United States, as long as self-defense is claimed by those such as George Zimmerman and Michael Dunn. Oh – and her desire to see attorney Benjamin Crump lose his license to practice law ranks almost equal to her being a third-party used by Mr. Stalker to continue his harassment of myself.

Nettle's harassment

As I said in the beginning; Protect yourself at all times.

Ignoring internet trolls on sites that allow public comment is one thing. It can be done and is usually effective because trolls go from place to place on the internet and do not generally target individuals for stalking and harassment. Today’s form of internet stalker and harasser does not stop when they are ignored. They become worse. They spread out their lies and harassment on the internet, even on internet sites where their target victims do not participate and may not know about.

We should work together so that the stalkers and harassers have no power to make their intentions bear fruit. It starts by first identifying them. The second is to report their behavior, even if the source they use does nothing. The third is to identity and inform others of their methods of operation.

Reporting them to the sources they use is important, even if those sources do nothing. Responses from the sources are important if it becomes necessary to pursue legal options. Not only do they serve as evidence for when and how long the harassment has taken place, but they also serve as evidence of your efforts to stop harassment. Some states hold internet hosting companies liable if harassment has been reported to them and they do nothing to stop it.

We are at a time when determining harassment via electronic communications is within the decision of customer service representatives. The companies do not consider the content and motivation in the communications. Certainly, those who harass are not concerned with their future in terms of reputation or lives disrupted because they have no careers and no family embarrassed by the defamation.

Those known to harass myself and others live off some form of disability, public assistance, or money donated to them through their blog of Facebook page. They are not concerned that 2 years from now they might apply for a job and the employer goes on the internet in search of their background to find disparaging remarks about them written on social media.

We need legislation that is clear and simple; if a person feels that they are harassed, then it’s not up to customer service reps to make that determination. The source used to harass must do everything within their power to stop the harassment.

Facebook has taken down numerous pages posted by Mr. Stalker, and Youtube has suspended his accounts, only to have him re-open accounts under other handles and through proxy IP addresses to repeat the same behavior. Currently, Mr. Stalker has at least three separate Twitter accounts. He recently opened another Facebook page using a new handle so he can continue his harassment, and inconvenience law enforcement to subpoena for information from Facebook to verify that it is the same person who the court has ordered to stop harassing me.

Protect yourself at all times, know your options, and know those who will support you if you are harassed.

UPDATE 2/21/2015

Because of several lies circulating, I want to address them.  I’ve never been on Twitter as “GZWarrior.”  GZWarrior was known to be Jad Savage whose Twitter account was eventually suspended.

Not once have I told Vicki Pate or anyone else that I have a restraining order against her.  Her mistake was filing a declaration in the case that Mr. Stalker filed. She voluntarily interjected herself in that case on Mr. Stalker’s behalf, and the court denied him a restraining order against me.

Around May of 2014, Mr. Stalker was the first to post documents pertaining to my identity on the internet and he sent a comment to this blog with the link for where he posted it.  In July 2014, the court granted me a three-year restraining order against Mr. Stalker and among other instructions, ordered him to remove my personal information from the internet.  Mr. Stalker went so wild posting my personal information in various places on the internet that he did not take down that material from every source where he posted it.

Those same documents that he originally posted and sent a comment to this blog with a link to where he posted it were subsequently posted by Vicki Pate on her blog and elsewhere.  That is why the hosting sites removed pages from her blog and elsewhere.  In other words, there is evidence that Mr. Stalker was the person who originally posted that material.  Any place on the internet where that material is posted is in violation of the restraining order.

A word to the wise is, before anyone involves themselves doing Mr. Stalker’s dirty work for him, they should get a copy of the restraining order and consult with a lawyer.  The legal departments of at least 5 hosting sources have understood the restraining order correctly and removed material that the court ordered removed.

About scrodriguez2

Former writer for We Hold These Truths To Be Self Evident

Posted on 01/23/2015, in Cyber-bullying, Cyberharassment, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 119 Comments.

  1. fuctnuts.. (favorite new word) every single one of them…

    Yes, I have viewed some youtube videos of the ‘false flag’ theories. It’s hard for sane people to understand that some folks really believe things like that.

    I hate it that the sickest psychos have this need for control and power to the point where they bother folks like Denise Souriall, you and so many others with their hateful nastiness. Can you imagine what it must be like inside their heads? BLECH..

    They will eventually, all turn on each other, they way some already have. Karma is a bitch and every. single. one of them will get what they deserve.

    Like

    • Mindmyme,

      I hate it that the sickest psychos have this need for control and power to the point where they bother folks like Denise Souriall, you and so many others with their hateful nastiness. Can you imagine what it must be like inside their heads? BLECH..

      When you don’t have the heart and mind of hateful people, it’s hard to figure out. They highly disapprove of victims connecting and sharing information.

      They will eventually, all turn on each other, they way some already have.

      Yes. They compete with each other rather than support each other. Their inner fights are personal. Because Denise has an attorney and along with Santiago pursuing his legal options, hopefully the harassers will learn their lesson. Also, one of my attorneys had Miss Filth’s violation removed from a site, so she knows that I’m not playing.

      Like

      • What are these people lacking in their own lives that moves them to feel this kind of behavior is appropriate? It boggles the mind. It really does.

        Like

        • I’m not sure I even want to fathom what kind of emptiness of the heart would drive one to do this sort of thing.

          Like

        • Psychologists have tried explaining it, but I think the foundational characteristic of our harassers is that they are liars and deceptive, which are not mental problems.

          For example, the harasser who admires me so much that she patterned her Twitter handle after this blog (blanc_papillon7 for Whitebutterfly7) alleges that I have a bit over 100 followers. The blog has over 450 followers. If she’s talking about Twitter, my account is protected. That means that those who want to follow me on Twitter ask for approval. I don’t approve all requests. So, she’s being deceptive about it. She wants to compete in some sort of popularity contest. That’s her mindset.

          Also, she must think that scrodriguez doesn’t have author privileges because she alleges that I won’t allow him to write for the blog. That’s an agenda to try to stir up people to ask him about it. No one is suppose to read the title and the “by line” underneath to know she’s lying. No one is suppose to have experience with Word Press blogs and privileges to know that the by-line is controlled by the program based on signing into the Word Press account and accessing the text box, and it cannot be changed.

          She does seek to take advantage of people believing what she says without reading for themselves.

          The American Holocaust thread, according to Miss Filth, is not about how Hitler’s Germany operated in placing value upon people and ridding their society of those they believed were imperfect but rather, she postures it as an article where I compare the Jewish Holocaust “to black criminals being killed by police.” She skips over those who are not Black and killed by police that are reported on this blog.

          Another thing that they all have in common is being vindictive, and using anything to justify being vindictive. That is what Santiago experienced too. Because he didn’t remove his internet presence after Mr. Stalker told him to, Mr. Stalker came at him stronger, more deliberate, and with more lies, including mocking Santiago’s wife.

          By the way, Mr. Stalker has told numerous people to go kill themselves. What does that convey? An intention to cause people so much emotional distress that they will consider suicide.

          Mind boggling, indeed.

          Like

          • it’s so hard to imagine the nastiness isn’t considered a mental deficiency. Sane people don’t do things like that.

            Like

          • I’m incapable of even relating to what one would be trying to convey by telling someone to kill themselves. Awful, awful, awful.

            Like

            • Eurobrat, after he has consistently attacked people with brutal language, he turns to his ultimate desire by telling them to kill themselves, and sometimes he adds “immediately.” He even has a video where he acts as if he’s killing himself.

              Like

            • Wow. I’ve seen some pretty atrocious online behavior, but this really takes the cake. Stay strong, guys. Sending positive vibes your way!!

              Like

        • well lets look at what they all have in common.

          1) You see them active on social media all day id say about 14 hours of their day is on social media, Average person sleeps 8 hours whats that tell you?

          2) no real life outside of the internet the common factor we all see here is that none of them have any family ties no significant other in their lives and most of them are middle aged that speaks volumes I mean okay dont get me wrong but some people prefer not to be married I can dig it.
          But not to even have a relationship that says allot about their personality in my opinion.

          3) They have NOTHING I mean nothing and likely this is what adds to their anger they see other people out there who out live them in life out shine them and have things they want in their life, Jealousy and envy can and has consumed them.
          Ever hear that term, if they are hating on you, that means your doing something right?

          4) Mental illness, I honestly do believe that the majority of the nutters that he is surrounded by are mentally ill just as he is. I mean what are the chances your going to find a group of middle aged people just below retirement age who all sit on Social Media all day? They cant say they inherited money, they cant say they retired when they know they didnt, its obvious as to how and why they are on Social Media all day.

          and Finally you have their sense of privilege they believe they really are entitled so you couple that with all stated above and you have a full fledged hater pissed off at the world because they failed in life.

          Like

          • You’re right on so many points. They hate that you have something they could never have and they resent you for it. It’s easier to try and tear others down to their level rather than deal with their own failures.

            Like

    • scrodriguez

      With out going to far into detail it has escalated to a level like no other in retaliation all I can say is that he has resorted to extortion at this point threatening if I do not back down from the hearing he will put my wifes career on blast.

      it is mind boggling to see his latest series of attacks knowing there is a hearing on its way. Yet at the same time he is still pretending that he is a victim smh….

      Like

      • Santiago,
        Know this — you are fighting this in a ring where there is a judge in a black robe who will decide. It’s not fought on the internet, neither decided by a jury of internet trolls and harassers. You have accomplished great things dealing with them, cutting down one branch at a time, but the court has the authority and power to cut down the entire tree.

        Like

        • scrodriguez

          I know its just a week away I am staying focused my wife has informed the president at the school the recent escalation of their threats extortion and harassment so if anything funky happens their IT department will trace it back to who ever.
          and if its through the mail it will be sent straight over to campus chief of police…. Crazy though that (edited) person states that (edited) is going to sue me I have no idea what her claim could be I mean hasnt she publicly claimed that (edited) was not her blog?
          and how can they sue me for protecting myself? anyhow really trying to just see this last week through here.

          Like

          • Let me see if I understand this correctly. You’re being blamed for and threatened with a lawsuit because Twitter suspended someone’s account? Do they not realize that you have a court order and Twitter has a legal department and their attorneys comply with the restraining order?

            It’s a bad thing that Mr. Stalker’s friends got caught up in his games. If they blame anyone it should be him. He somehow convinced others to do his dirty work for him. Certainly, they don’t want to open a can of worms for themselves which would effectively admit that they violated the court’s restraining order because they were helping a friend.

            Liked by 1 person

            • scrodriguez

              I am working on a resolution all the way across the board ill let you know more as it stands right now im focused on next week.

              Like

          • Want to let you know. The harassers are not known outside of their own circles. Since they put a link on their blog to this blog, there have been a mere 11 referrals from that link. That tells me that they either have a small amount of blog followers, or their followers don’t care, or maybe those who support you read there and clicked the link to here. Either way, I won’t give them free advertisement and so, don’t want the posting of their handles or blog titles here.

            Another blogger who highly disagrees with us subscribed to follow this blog, and her gravatar appeared under “My Community” until I changed the options. Along with another agenda, it was also her way of trying to get this blog’s visitors and followers to know of and visit her blog.

            Since this blog opened, they mockingly lie saying that there are only 4 followers and everyone who comments is my sock puppet. If that were true, they would not go so far as to violate law in effort to get their handles and blog titles on this blog. The only time I allow that is when I’ve included proof of their filthy comments so those reading here will know to what to expect if they encounter them.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Good morning Sis dropping the wife off for a meeting at USC. I’ll be back in a bit. They do telegraph as you stated, I mean hell they are worse than George Foreman

              Like

            • George Foreman? You mean Ernie Shavers, don’t you? LOL!

              Bullies always telegraph because that is part of their intimidation strategy. Also, their actions have no effect unless their victims know what they did, are doing, and in the case of internet, where.

              Liked by 1 person

            • scrodriguez

              Shavers was another one slow wide and predictable

              Like

            • LOL! Shavers also had a habit of ducking his head first. Those of us watching his fights would say at the same time when he ducked his head, “Watch his right arm. He’s taking it back, he’s taking it back. Man! He was hit!”

              Like

  2. yahtzeebutterfly

    Great article, scrodriguez!

    What you have shared…your experience and insights…shines the spotlight on these harassers and their methods.

    Like

  3. Ugh, so sorry that you and Xena have to live with this kind of insanity. A good reminder for me to be cautious when I’m out and interacting in the blogworld. You never know who you might be talking to. Thank you for posting.

    Like

    • You know how Miranda rights read? Anything you say can and will be used against you? Well, the harassers are like that. I’ve publicly shared that my husband is dead. For doing that, I am mocked by blanc_papillon7 for being a widow. She intends for it to hurt me when it actually reveals more about her personality.

      Santiago’s wife is a college professional. He proudly talked about her successes. For that, the harassers demeaned her by saying she couldn’t be that educated because she married him. Then Mr. Stalker went about contacting the college where she works in effort to disparage her by saying what her husband does online. That is when Santiago went to court for a restraining order against Mr. Stalker.

      Like

      • That is just horrible. I really don’t understand what would drive people to do something like this. I feel awful for both of you, but now I also feel a bit sad for them–what kind of hole do they have in their soul?

        Like

        • Hurt people, hurt people.

          Like

        • Xena, for Mr. Stalker to go to such great lengths to interfere with ones employment is unconscionable California, like most states provide a private right of action for Intentional Interference With Contractual Relations, which is what Mr. Stalker did when he contacted Santiago’s wife’s employer.

          “The elements which a plaintiff must plead to state the cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relations are (1) a valid contract between plaintiff and a third party; (2) defendant’s knowledge of this contract; (3) defendant’s intentional acts designed to induce a breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; (4) actual breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; and (5) resulting damage.” (Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co. (1990) 50 Cal.3d 1118, 1126 [270 Cal.Rptr. 1, 791 P.2d 587], internal citations omitted.)

          Mr. Stalker’s conduct should be adjudged by the California judicial systems, which would send a message, that this type of tortious conduct will not be tolerated. Mr. Stalker and others alike should know that they cannot hide behind the bounds of a keyboard and mouse, whilst reaping havoc under the guise of protected speech.

          It is beyond doubt, based on Sandiego’s recent post, that they are pushing an agenda. It it so clear and barefaced, I liken it to a person, “unzipping and letting it all hang out”.

          Like

          • supabutterfly,

            It is beyond doubt, based on Sandiego’s recent post, that they are pushing an agenda.

            Indeed. In the article is a screenshot of a comment that Mr. Stalker submitted to this blog. His intent is to “take down” Santiago and myself. Notice too where he says I should become familiar with the Word Press delete feature. His comments are laced with words indicating that his actions are based on race or perceived race.
            His threats were not made until Miss Filth and Hoffstyle71’s actions were fruitless. If you have time and have not done so already, read https://blackbutterfly7.wordpress.com/2014/11/01/wctv-reports-on-a-cyber-harrassing-blogger/.
            On that post are screenshots of comments publicly posted on other blogs going back to 2012 showing the beginning and intent of the harassers. That is why I refer to them as cyber-extortionists.

            Like

      • scrodriguez

        We have court on Feb 26th @ 8:30 am for violations of the restraining order since he refuses to honor the court order perhaps the courts will make him reconsider

        Like

        • Scrodriguez,
          That’s good news.

          Like

          • scrodriguez

            He just filed for an extension on his appeal in Los angeles claiming he was sick for two weeks and fell behind.

            Like

            • Know what? Let him motion for all the extensions that he wants. The court’s final order stands unless another person in a black robe reverses it. He cannot continue violating the order of the court under his belief that it’s not valid until the Appellate Court decides. It’s just the opposite — it’s totally valid UNLESS the Appellate Court reverses.

              Does he also understand that if the Appellate court reverses the trial court, that he will have to come to court for a re-trial?

              Like

            • scrodriguez

              Xena,

              thats the part I dont get everybody knows that the order is valid he believes there is some motion of stay that automatically went into place. doesnt work like that, you dont need to know the law to understand how this works.

              1st you have to prove the court ruled in error and it is only then that the higher court will grant him a retrial (The order would remain in effect until the end of that retrial)

              From there he has to win the retrial in order to reverse it, in other words he has to win at the higher court, then win superior court

              Like

            • thats the part I dont get everybody knows that the order is valid he believes there is some motion of stay that automatically went into place. doesnt work like that, you dont need to know the law to understand how this works.

              You’re being logical and not trying to circumvent an order of the court. DP consistently demonstrated circumventing blocking procedures for Word Press blogs by using other computers and proxy IP addresses. That is what he does — circumvents.

              Where he lacks understanding is that he looked at a federal bankruptcy case for supporting that a notice of appeal stays proceedings and the judgment. In bankruptcy, that would apply, for example, to an order of the court to pay money to another party. Even in issues of selling property, the litigant must file and be granted a motion to stay the sell pending appeal.

              He also misunderstands that a stay pending appeal is not interpreted as disobeying the order of the court.

              1st you have to prove the court ruled in error and it is only then that the higher court will grant him a retrial (The order would remain in effect until the end of that retrial)

              It’s called “reverse and remand.” Remand should be understood that the litigants go back to the trial court and have a do-over. When the appellate failed to appear in court like DP did, it is not likely that the Appellate Court will reverse and remand.

              Like

    • Two sides to a story

      The harassment does often start with fairly innocent contact. I’ve had “conversations” with several of these individuals at times on social media, before it became apparent they not only had odd beliefs, but rabidly odd beliefs. I’ve even ribbed them back a bit, especially one I felt was a bit too smart to be such a racist (but sadly, really isn’t all that smart because she continues to flaunt reality). But as for all the nasty DP -style nastiness, doxing, frivolous court case filing – that’s just way out of line in anyone’s book. I would suppose he’s projecting his own desire to kill his sorry self when he tells other people to kill themselves.

      Like

      • He probably is. I still think something must be missing inside of him for him to go that far.

        And as far as the innocent contact–see, that’s the scary thing about it. I’ve had online conversations before with people who sounded a little “different,” but you can never tell on the Interwebs if the person is just kinda weird and interesting or about to go completely crazy on you. Yikes.

        Like

  4. chuquestaquenumber1

    To Sc Rodriguez and Xena. Thank you for these posts.Keep up the fight. I remember Xena’s fight with a particular male cyberstalker. Again what can those of us who support your efforts do.

    Like

    • Chuquest,
      Because the harassers do most of their dirt on social media, it all depends on whether a person has an account on that social media. If so, they can report the harassment.

      If you know someone in law enforcement that can help get through the red tape and passing of the proverbial buck, it would help to put us in contact with that person. If so, let me know and I’ll email you.

      If you follow other blogs that blog on the same interests as we do here, let them know that comments are being submitted to bloggers that warn them to stop associating with Blackbutterfly7. I would like to have those comments.

      Be aware and tell others to do the same, when reading criticism of a person. The harassers have no evidence to support their claims. Don’t engage the harassers. It has been the experience of a friend that when she asks for proof, they block her.

      Santiago might have additional comment and if you think of anything you can do, please do so. I REALLY APPRECIATE your kind words and desire to help. Thank you so much.

      Like

  5. Ali Hurry @HurryCaneAlly · 11m 11 minutes ago

    Yall are a massive joke that isn’t the slightest bit funny. @KeirAlley @AngelDevil1166 @shylohg @YeaaahAboutThat @brandonujohnson
    View conversation
    0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites

    Nice huh! GEESH!

    Like

    • Shyloh, there seems to be lots of harassment on Twitter regarding those wanting justice for Kendrick Johnson. It’s been too much for me to keep up with but it sounds as if those who believe that Kendrick died by accident are fighting with those who believe that a kid with the last name Bell was involved in Kendrick’s death.

      I have a personal policy that when a case is being investigated by the feds, I don’t dig deep into it and only post what the media reports if I have time to do so. What has and is happening in Valdosta, Georgia is really nasty. The Bell family sued Ebony Magazine and a journalist, and I’ve not followed up on the status of that case. I am more interested in that suit than I am the suits filed by Kendrick’s parents because the judges have already recused themselves due to conflict of interest, and said that the lawsuits will need to be filed in another jurisdiction. That speaks volumes about the conditions there.

      Like

  6. I also want to say I am so sorry for what has happened to all of you being harassed. It’s awful. I stand behind you all the way. We stand together for one another. That’s how it works.

    Like

  7. Jackie Saulmon Ramirez

    It’s insane! I can’t believe in this day and age that the law cannot stop these cyber harassers. This is crazy. 😦

    Like

    • Jackie, here is something about the law.

      In California, there is a law that allows for civil restraining orders. However, if the restraining order is violated, it becomes a criminal matter. That means that the court’s order is as good as a blank piece of paper until law enforcement does it job. In Santiago’s situation, he is working with two jurisdictions; the county where he resides, and the county where the harasser resides. That means that law enforcement where the harasser resides has to serve the warrant. It ALSO means that they try to do so at a time when the other county can send transportation to pick up and transport the harasser back to the county that issued the restraining order.

      What the law enforcement agencies in the two different counties should do, is put a trace on the harasser’s computer usage through his internet service provider so they can keep track of the numerous handles that he uses. They do that in other cases of harassment when the person is important, like a politician or beauty queen. It would save them time from serving subpoenas on Twitter, Facebook, etc., and then have to wait for them to respond.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Jackie Saulmon Ramirez

        This is so convoluted that it sounds like a cover for inaction. It’s dizzying to think of all you and others have gone through dealing with this. 😦

        Like

        • Jackie,
          Just imagine what it’s like for parents to try to stop their children who are harassed on social media. From working their way through clicking “report abuse” to contacting their local law enforcement, they find no resolve. Also imagine how difficult it is for children to explain the methods used by harassers. Today’s harassers start by trying to place their target victims on the defense by presenting lies as facts. Children might feel that to show their parents the harassment will require them to explain why it’s a lie. Law enforcement might ask why the lie is harmful. Imagine a child trying to answer that.

          Liked by 1 person

    • They can it just takes allot of time considering the methods they use I can say this and I do believe this once he gets summonsed for violations that becomes a criminal matter.
      And he will be summonsed no doubt about it, I believe that while this does happen they will all go on the attack and make threats. But once he is convicted I am sure those idiots may re consider their wicked ways

      Liked by 1 person

      • Jackie Saulmon Ramirez

        Instead of reconsidering their ‘wicked ways’ you can bet they will spend time coming up with new ways to harass and torment. 😦

        Like

        • Well to be honest I believe in time they will stand down Ms. Filth isnt only facing this law suit I know of two other cases in which attorneys have reached out to me at this time im not speaking on the matter though.

          Liked by 1 person

  8. scrodriguez

    Dont take my word for it his facebook page is http://www.facebook.com/tdpexileisland he went on a rant last night for hours while I was at my nephews birthday party

    Like

    • I have a hard time trying to follow Facebook pages. From what I saw, it looks like he went after somebody but I can’t figure it out and there are more than 1,000 comments.

      Like

    • I had to laugh at his rant about where the condo and then he posts a link proving what you have said. The man really is a fool and some of his rants only prove his jealousy of what you have, a wife, family, home and a life.

      Like

      • scrodriguez

        Envy consumes this group of Twidiots, however when they hate like that it only motivates us to excel. we have our eyes set on 4 different houses we will soon be moving and of course there will be no trace of us when we do PO Box city….

        But when he does finally find us again im sure the hate will flow like never before…

        Like

        • Something occurred to me, cops can have their names taken off property records that are made public to avoid bad guys from finding them. I wonder if you can get the court to give you the same due to your stalker.

          No one should have to live in hiding, ie…post office boxes to avoid a stalker. I continually hope that laws continue to get tougher with these individuals and enforcement of rulings become easier. One should not have to wade through the multi-jurisdiction of agencies to get action.

          Congrats on the new home, you are right envy is a driving factor with them. I remember when you posted a photo of a wad of cash and the most Mr. Stalker could come back with is monopoly money, LOL. You are a winner in life and it drives him nuts.

          Like

          • scrodriguez

            Thank you we are not in escrow yet we are really taking our time with this one because we want this to be our final house.
            I know that this week things are going to take a hard right turn for him… I aint going to say much in terms of what is going on legally I will let him rant and rave about it when it all goes down cus you know he will.

            Like

          • scrodriguez

            another thing though that money had to go to replace a transmission that went out…..

            Like

    • Two sides to a story

      That was entertaining. Lots and lots of the old Znuts from the OM support page days are still jawing on the new page. Well, well, well.

      Like

  9. Yesterday morning another “Friend” of his messaged me on facebook with a link to pastebin.com he uploaded another “Dox” sheet, However the majority of the info is yet again false.
    He also continues to defame me claiming I am a convicted wife beater and child abuser claims now that there is a warrant in Washington for Domestic Violence sure there is chump thats why when I have filed 4 police reports for violations of the RO not once did I get taken into custody and I live in LA they warrant check everybody.

    in addition he also claimed there is a federal rico investigation involving me and Attorney Crump….

    But here is the part thats screwed up they claim to have my fathers information and posted it along with his address phone number and business information. Well I hate to break the news to them but my father does not live in California and the person they doxed claiming was my father is a citizen of the city I live in now putting a stranger I dont even know in the line of fire.

    I reported this new information to authorities and also spoke with Chief Bruce Hartman who works with FCC Campus police who is now opening an active case there to charge him in his city as well.

    Like

    • It’s their standard operating procedure to mis-characterize “public documents.”

      Does he have any idea what federal RICO is?

      Like

      • You kidding me he doesnt even understand what a motion of stay means

        Like

        • 🙂 Oh yeah — that argument about filing a notice of appeal reinstates the temporary order and also means that he can disobey the final order because it is “stayed”; and he cited a federal bankruptcy case to support his contention. He is the type of pro per litigant that impugns those pro per litigants who know what they’re doing in the judicial system.

          Like

    • Sounds like you’re doing everything you can, and doing it right to get this nut to stop harrassing you

      Like

  10. OMG I lost my comment!! and I didn’t save it!!! damnnnn!
    anyway I was saying DP is obsessed with you and its creepy! VP is an angry old hatehag prison penpal type who’s obsessed w/these killers & defends them every waking moment hoping one will notice her! she even went to lick gz’s feet in florida, even w/samatha there!! that’s what she’s attracted to! or I shld say, she’s a murderer groupiebitch pervert!

    Liked by 1 person

    • oh gross are you kidding me, welp even Charles Manson has groupies.

      Liked by 1 person

      • that’s what I mean. she’s a creepy ass child murder lover. the woman traveled all the way to florida to suck up to gz, even when samatha was there & while talking shit about her & her mom on twitter & her stupid blog, at the failed gun show when he was relegated to the closet. she was one of the 12 whole ppl who talked to him! who does that??!! only freaks. prison pen pals. the types who marry prisoners!!
        she’s gross! and so is samatha. but she’s not the only one. there’s this woman on Twitter who gz calls & visits &she tweets about his ‘woman’ getting jealous when he talks to (her) other women. Jutta loosa or something like that. she’s always tweeting JR&GZ offering help and they favor her. it’s sick.

        Like

  11. yahtzeebutterfly

    On a lighter note, here is a fun video:

    Like

  12. scrodriguez

    This is where my mindset is right now, if you have HBO the 3rd fight between these two starts in a little over 3 hours and believe me this will not be a snore fest https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bET4pl1xm7A

    Like

  13. I’m going to sit down somewhere more comfortable and had a better read of this. Fascinating. Thank you.

    Like

  14. A Common Sense Thought/Question to Bloggers

    Why would a person who has never supported your blog in anyway, advise, suggest or warn you to not associate with another blogger?

    That’s like coming into a store, telling the owner that you have passed the store many times, but you never purchased anything. That is followed along the lines of, “but watch out for that customer who has supported your store for years and stop going to his store.”

    Like

  15. I am a virtual greenhorn on the internet. Reading this has been quite the education. This is everyone’s nightmare. It sounds like justice is ineffective, time consuming, expensive and emotionally draining. Times like this is when I like the old Italian way of doing things. This is frightening. I don’t blog for income. It is just a way for me to let out my frustrations on certain issues. I like doing the research and uncovering incidental facts. To me this is fun. It is a shame that others would try to steal this pleasure and one’s peace of mind. I wish there was an easier way to stop these people in their tracks!

    Like

    • Gronda,
      Welcome to Blackbutterfly7 and thanks for the comment.
      I remember when you first started blogging. Miss Filth posted a comment on your blog that insulted your handle, and claimed knowing my real name. When I discovered it, the post no longer allowed comments and you didn’t have any recent posts for me to submit a comment to. You probably didn’t realize that Miss Filth was using your blog to further her slanderous, lying agenda. That comment was posted on your blog a long time ago, but Mr. Stalker copies and pastes it to circulate showing their dirty work.

      I would ask that you please be vigilant.

      Like

      • I was totally clueless about what was going on and I wish I had known. I know enough on the computer to get by. This has given me the incentive to sign up for a computer course. I blog intermittently. I was so upset over Trayvon Martin so that I was determined to blog. It literally took me months and with a lot of frustration to learn the basics and Word press was a nightmare. I started blogging again around the 2014 November elections. I had been supporting Charlie Crist because he had publicly stated that he would do something about the “stand your ground” law. Then I started blogging again over the Michael Brown case. I probably will stop for awhile until I take a class to learn enough to protect my self. Too bad this is not an ACLU case because these sick monsters are interfering with peoples’ rights to freely express themselves.

        Like

        • Gronda,
          Depending on the theme you use, Word Press can give you headaches. 🙂 Word Press has forums and videos that show how to work with the administration side of the blog, including how to place IP addresses in the moderation queue and “blacklist” queue. They provide those queues to give blog administrators ability to control comments that get posted to the public board, and to also send comments from harassers into the spam queue.

          I visited other blogs and noticed homepages that had a portion of articles with “read more.” I went to a Word Press forum and found that the “more” tag is on the text box, so that is something that it took me time to learn after I became curious and wanted to use it. I also started out using pages instead of posts. (I should have used posts.)

          Because I participated on other blogs, there was a blogger who was VERY helpful in introducing me to how some things work on Word Press blogs, such as the embedding of videos and codes used in comments to bold and italicize.

          Don’t give up. Learning all the stuff that Word Press provides for blogs is a situation of learning as you go. Hang in there.

          Like

          • Thanks for the feedback. I was looking at whonoze when I noticed a link to this site. I have been just starting to view other blogger sites. I visited Jueseppi B’s site because he has been kind enough to reblog most of my work a lot. I accidentally clicked on a site called obamacat. After I recovered from the shock I mentioned to him that he shouldn’t let his stalker steal his peace. I did not understand how insidious this cyber stalking is but this is exactly what they do. They steal your piece of mind. My son w family will be visiting me in Florida from Chicago, mid February. He is an attorney at a big name law firm. I’ll ask him if his firm handles cases involving cyber stalking and what they do to deal with them. I am horrified to learn about all of this and that I was an unwitting conduit for Ms. Filth. I have learned how to place comments that are ugly in the scam bucket. I have had to do this a few times. The comments mentioned something about science.

            Like

            • Gronda,

              He is an attorney at a big name law firm. I’ll ask him if his firm handles cases involving cyber stalking and what they do to deal with them.

              What Jueseppi and I experience is not general cyber-stalking. It’s cyber-extortion. I would not mind speaking with your son and I reside in Illinois.

              The harassers want us off the internet. We know who TheObamaCat is. When she invited me to write for a blog in which she is 1 of 3 administrators, I accepted. After about the second article, she started complaining that Jueseppi was “stealing” what others write. He reblogs. Word Press allows reblogging. I tried explaining that to her. Then she said he was disrespectful of women. When that didn’t change my mind, she said he buys Twitter followers. She badgered me constantly asking that I file complaints against him. She wants him banned from Word Press, banned from Facebook, and banned from Twitter. Why? Because he reblogs.

              Most recently, TheObamaCat crossed the line by introducing race into her harassment.

              My experience with Miss Filth was not one-on-one like it was with TheObamaCat. The first comment she submitted to this blog instructed me to stop associating with another blogger or she would ruin my reputation. I thought, what reputation? About 3 months later, she made up a reputation for me. I’ve received numerous threats of what they would do if I do not delete this blog or transform it into a one that solely reports “black on black” crime.

              Miss Filth sent and sends comments to other bloggers warning them to stop associating with me. Her threats are based on her perception of race.

              In other words, there activities are in violation of federal law.

              Like

          • I will talk to my son about this and get back to you. This is horrifying. I just went back to look at my comments and found this comment which I will dump. I have placed this in the spam bucket several times already and it keeps popping up again.

            pittsgreer
            9 days ago • janepittsgreer1.wordpress.com
            .

            The Science of Why Cops Shoot Young Black Men
            And how to reform our bigoted brains.
            —By Chris Mooney | Mon Dec. 1, 2014 6:00 AM EST

            pittsgreer
            9 days ago • janepittsgreer1.wordpress.com
            .

            Science explains why cops shoot black men – Boing Boing THERE IS A SCIENCE we really do not have to debate this why we do not use it — just wanted to share you know where i am

            Like

            • Gronda,
              I’ll email you with some options to use. For one, I see where although the person opened a Word Press blog, there is no content on it. Although the blog has no content, the article that the person refers to was published in Mother Jones. It is not a negative article. The comment may not have been to harass but I would question whether it’s on topic with the subject on your blog.

              Like

          • Thanks for checking into this. I will definitely be more careful.

            Like

  16. I will say this though even though his BS is still continuing he is not as blatant as he was in the past he has locked down his twitter, uses fake pages on facebook to conceal his acts in other words he is some what contained for the most part

    Like

    • He’s getting others to do his harassment for him. What I have is a copy and paste and not the actual comment, but he or one of his minions sent a comment to another blogger claiming that you’re TheHoodReport, hate gays, and they should stop participating on this blog because I allow you to write for it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • scrodriguez

        of course they are going to claim I am this user or that user they have no dirt on me I mean he did this for all three cases, found accounts on social media that belonged to people who didnt speak to highly of him then used screen shots trying to claim those were my accounts

        Like

        • DP is a desperate, dishonest person. He posts all over the internet and changes his handles constantly, but always leaves evidence that it is him. I remember when he changed his handle once on Nettles’ blog, and she outed him.

          They give themselves away because they are suppose to be a newcomer, yet know everything about you, and repeat the same lies they repeated under other handles.

          For years, they claimed that I used other handles but it was their attempt to disparage this blog. I was suppose to be everyone who posts comments here. LOL!

          Like

          • scrodriguez

            And as we speak he continues to violate the order on his facebook page collecting screens to show the court…

            Like

            • scrodriguez,
              He has diarrhea of the mouth, and too much confidence that he can continue harassment without being identified. He has a trademark. His minions do too.

              Like

            • scrodriguez

              He just posted this on his page
              “Exile Island Just got off phone with judges clerk. Everything is set up. I make a telephone appearance on 2/26 and invoke my right to counsel.
              29 mins
              Exile Island Case is then continued while Court appoints a lawyer for me who then takes over from there.
              29 mins
              Exile Island Lawyer then prepares a motion to toss Dayglow’s frivolous contempt filing for lack of standing”

              Like

            • And so, he’s taking that advice from a clerk, not realizing that the clerk then completes a form that he has been officially served notice of the Rule to Show Cause and hearing date?

              Lack of standing? How does he get that you are a protected party on the restraining order?

              That has to be his interpretation of “stay” pending appeal. That is not the same as lack of standing.

              There’s a California case decision I was reading, Karnazes v. Ferry. It’s an unpublished decision and cannot be cited, but it is a good lesson on how the court (and Appellate Court) decides cases involving restraining orders when the respondent fails to appear.

              Essentially, when a party fails to appear, they waive their right to argue anything that is not on the record. Since they were not present to put anything on the record, they cannot raise the defense they WOULD HAVE raised in the lower court, to the Appellate Court. The appeal therefore is moot. The Appellate Court generally affirms the trial court in those cases.

              Why did the parties in the case fail to appear? Because “… they mistakenly believed their notices of appeal of the prior orders “stayed” the merits hearing.”

              Like

            • Re: DP calling in for the hearing. Did the clerk give him the California Court call number and tell him to register on the website for a call-in extension and pay the $85.00 fee when he registers?

              Like

          • Two sides to a story

            It’s hilarious how Nettles always outs DP. But she uses him too. They deserve each other.

            Like

          • Two sides to a story

            That mindset typically lies and connives and then accuses everyone else of all the things they do. Create a zillion sock puppet accounts and then claim that you’re really someone else.

            Like

            • Two sides,
              I admit to not understanding the ideologies and mindsets of people who take time to do that. Since early 2013, a Miss Filth alleged that everyone posting comments on this blog was my sock puppet and she also alleged that there are only 4 people who post comments. I don’t understand the rationale behind that or why she would be interested in this blog’s activity.

              When I launched the My Community widget, the leader of the extortion pack alleged that I did so to give the blog credibility since non-Blacks follow. Then, Nettles started following this blog as if to prove the pack leader’s accusation or to force me to disengage the My Community widget. I changed the options so that only those who click like or post a comment appear under My Community.

              If only they minded their own business (sigh).

              Like

          • Xena,

            OMG I just got of the phone with the clerk he did not make any arrangements to appear by phone there is no continuance motioned and granted for.
            in fact the case isnt even showing on record yet should be later today or tomorrow…

            Whats crazy is the clerk thought I was him, (He did call) the clerk said all I can tell you is what I told you yesterday that there is an active restraining order that was granted on 7/24/2014 and its a 3 year permanent order and it is Valid.

            I replied: I know there is one, I am the petitioner in the matter, he then said oh…. what can I help you with.

            at that point I didnt need anything he told me all I need to know court is on the 26th

            Like

            • Xena,

              in other words he tried to tell the court clerk that there is no active restraining order lmfao

              Like

            • He is very mistaken and should talk with a lawyer about prohibitive injunctions. That takes some digging into California law because it’s not a usual situation of people violating restraining orders that prohibits them from harassing protected parties. Most folks have enough common sense to know that when the court orders them to stop harassment, it doesn’t mean they can continue just because they filed an appeal.

              I know he is reading here so I will say this — Mr. Stalker, ask a California lawyer about prohibitive injunctions and whether they are stayed on appeal. Also ask if a court’s order is invalid without a person in a black robe finding it invalid. You don’t wear the black robe.

              Like

            • Judges are not required to teach litigants proper procedure. What DP fails to understand is that if he wants to appear by phone, the California courts have specific procedures for that, and it requires a fee of $85.00 paid in advance.

              This is why it is important for him to consult with legal counsel. Since he is disabled, there should be some legal organization that will give him consultation and even representation free of charge. I suspect he has not and will not pursue that option because the law is against his actions and no attorney will defend him.

              Like

            • scrodriguez

              He will have an attorney but the attorney will do everything in his power to try and keep this from going before the judge.
              I will not mediate to resolve this, he refuses to stop I have the evidence to meet the burden of proof. I will ask the court that if he is to do jail time in addition to fines or community service that his jail sentence is not run concurrent that its run consecutive this is the only way he will learn

              Like

            • I agree. The type of harassment that he and his gang does is not general harassment. They intend to cause harm by contacting employers. They post lies to demean and denigrate reputations. They post personal info and “public documents” that they interpret to meet their agenda. Like what VP did with Denise and Trent, she omitted that the cases were dismissed.

              Like

  17. Yo! What is up with this lil hate machine rumor between myself, Xena, and SR in the minds of David Cultists? Cause I am cool with Xena and SR and am not TW.

    Keep on trucking Xena.

    Danny

    Like

    • Danny,
      I haven’t seen you for ages! How are you? I don’t keep up with the soap opera activity of the cyber-extortionists so have no clue about what you mention. As I understand it, they are always accusing me of something. If it’s not me, it’s someone else.

      Like

      • Hey Xena! I have not been feeling too well and will leave that out for obvious reasons. Hope you all are doing well.

        I have no clue what is going on or who these new people are involved in this or how I am being mentioned. Apparently people believe I am on Twitter under specific account.
        I did not close my blog (where I actually wrote things ) to go play Twitter games with a bunch of paronoid angry people! I have no use for Twitter.
        Sorry about the other comment. You can delete it. I skipped past reading the post before.
        I am pretty confident as a victim you can understand the level of low these people will go to continue to harass people. She is still claiming I am Jess? LOL. She seemed to have gotten to SR.
        I hope I can address SR briefly. When she claimed I was her mole sending her emails you threatened to force me into COURT to produce none existent emails. When they claim I am these lunatic accounts defending myself you believe it without a second glance. I do not care what or who you believe, you are a grown man. But, going around FURTHERING your harassers agenda against me as if I somehow am attempting to get information is insane! Do you seriously for one second believe I would allow these people to harass me to bring you down? What would I gain SR? I lost my blog put a bullseye on me for YOU and I get this? I never once asked any of you to defend me but when you needed I did and look what I get. All I am saying man is you are letting them win pulling this $h¡t.

        I really don´t have time for this. I am not feeling well, and I am not getting back on here to defend against this. Believe what you want.

        Like

        • Danny,
          I have no clue what is going on between you and Santiago, and I would prefer that you guys call it a truce at least here on this blog. Santiago shares his story to inform others about the seriousness he has experienced and to suggest some options when dealing with cyberharassers.

          Liked by 1 person

        • No You came back followed me then DM me and said your not interested in whats gone on between me and my stalker.
          I got it okay no worries, but the rest of this nonsense your mustering up is exactly that. I was never told any of that. in fact this is the first time in hearing anything about this so you are the one who has been played not me.
          all I knew is your account came back you said that shit in DM. maybe I got played by a mole but the rest of your stint is un true. I never threatened to force you to court so you can miss me with that one. I have no agenda against you or anybody. once your gone and blocked thats it and I blocked you because of that DM stating you have no interest in whats happened between me and that idiot. so confirm was that you or not?

          Like

    • I know who TW is that user approached me on FB trying to pry info out of me about the case suddenly it was a clear pattern I have seen before and once I spoke about a specific person from the East Coast who had problems with him TW started to defend that person as if they knew who she was. it was a dead give away some people want the drama some have agendas I maintain what I have from the outset I want this shit to stop!!! that simple…

      Like

  18. I can however post Zimbots new found friends gilrette death threats to who Mr. Stalker & friends think or says is me. Indirect but intended death threaths to me. BTW. Why are they targeting me and Santiago? I have no issue with Santiago!

    Danny

    Like

  19. (Administrator’s note. Because there is recent court action, it is best that no comments are made about it. Hope you understand.)

    Like

  20. Clearly these trolls are insignificant.

    Like

  21. Reblogged this on Mysterious Observations and commented:
    Ms. Filth and Mr. Stalker, sounds like Clue or Get a Clue!

    Like

  22. Just a FYI

    I find that Santiago’s posts let others know that cyber-harassment can extend beyond the internet into the personal lives of victims. His posts are also necessary to address the misinformation that is being used for what appears to be intended for intimidation. For example, there is misinformation that reading a public site and taking evidence of harassment from that site is “stalking.”

    People who have harassed me read this blog regularly. They can do so. It’s open to the public to read just as the community Facebook pages that Mr. Stalker participates on. That is not cyberstalking. It progresses to cyberstalking when it results in taking or addressing content to make false accusations, humiliation, defamation, slander, libel. Cyberstalking can be gathering information for the purpose of intimidating, threatening, harassing.

    Gathering information from a public internet site to file with the court as evidence is not stalking.

    Mr. Stalker visits this blog regularly, and he gets content from it and posts it elsewhere on the internet along with his demeaning remarks about the person who wrote it. That is cyberstalking, cyberharassment.

    Additionally, Mr. Stalker’s copyright infringements have not gone unnoticed. Rather than have to file numerous cases each time he violates this blog’s copyright notice, I have suggested to let him run rampant and let his counter-challenges serve as evidence of his intentional misrepresentations.

    Final word — those committing cyberharassment can stop their behavior. They need go no further, and need not look for additional targets. Just stop.

    Like

Your comments are welcomed.

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: